Case Law › High Court › Icici Securities Limited v. The Assistan...

Icici Securities Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 3(2), Mumbai & Anr

High Court 24 Mar 2006 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

24 Mar 2006

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Icici Securities Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 3(2), Mumbai & Anr, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.739 OF 2006 ICICI Securities Limitedvs.The Assistant Commissioner of IncomeTax 3(2), Mumbai & anr. Petitioner Respondents Mr.Atul Jasani i/b.M/s.Kanga & Co. for the petitioner. Mr.S.R.Chauhan with Mr.R.Ashokan and Mr.A.D.Nagarjun forthe respondents. P.C. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 24th March, 2006 file fresh writ petition challenging the order dated 28th February, 2006 as well. 2. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (R.M.LODHA,J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.