Identical With The Facts In Tax Appeal v. Shrisatpuda Tapi Prarisar Ssk Ltd. And Others [(2010) 231 Cts (Sc) 224
High Court
10 Feb 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Identical With The Facts In Tax Appeal v. Shrisatpuda Tapi Prarisar Ssk Ltd. And Others [(2010) 231 Cts (Sc) 224
Date of order
10 Feb 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Remanded
Case summary
In Identical With The Facts In Tax Appeal v. Shrisatpuda Tapi Prarisar Ssk Ltd. And Others [(2010) 231 Cts (Sc) 224, the High Court (2012) remanded the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
TAX APPEAL NO. 77 OF 2008THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, NASHIKVERSUS
SATPUDA TAPI PARISAR SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD SHAHADA
...
ASG for Appellant : Shri Alok Sharma Advocate for Respondent : Shri S.V.Adwant...
CORAM : D. G. KARNIK & S. B. DESHMUKH, JJ.Dated: February 10, 2012
...
PER COURT :-
1Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
2By consent, the appeal is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission.
3Learned counsel for the parties submit that the facts in this appeal are
identical with the facts in Tax Appeal No.74 of 2008.
4Hence, for the reasons recorded in the order passed today in Tax Appeal No.74 of 2008, the impugned order is set aside ad the matter is remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for deciding it afresh in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. ShriSatpuda Tapi Prarisar SSK Ltd. and others [(2010) 231 CTS (SC) 224].
( S. B. DESHMUKH, J. ) ( D. G. KARNIK, J. )…
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.