In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Nedungadi Bankltd. (2003) 264 Itr 545, We Dismiss The Appeal Filed By The Revenue
High Court
27 Jul 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Nedungadi Bankltd. (2003) 264 Itr 545, We Dismiss The Appeal Filed By The Revenue
Date of order
27 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Nedungadi Bankltd. (2003) 264 Itr 545, We Dismiss The Appeal Filed By The Revenue, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: (2003) 264 ITR 545, we dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
MONDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2009 / 5TH SRAVANA 1931
ITA.No. 624 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.1208/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT
-----------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
TRICHUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
-------------------------
M/S.THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.,
THRISSUR.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 27/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.624 of 2009
....................................................................Dated this the 27th day of July, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since the issue raised is covered against the Revenue by decision
in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX V. NEDUNGADI BANKLTD. (2003) 264 ITR 545, we dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue