Case Law › High Court › In Income Tax Appeal v. Heard

In Income Tax Appeal v. Heard

High Court 30 Aug 2010 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

30 Aug 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In In Income Tax Appeal v. Heard, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3Time to remove office objections is extended by four weeks from today, failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to this Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.91 OF 2010 ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3992 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai: Appellant.versusM/s.Bombay Presidency-Radio Club, Mumbai: Respondents. Mr.Suresh Kumar a/w P S Sahadevan APP for the Appellant. CORAM :V C DAGA AND R M SAVANT, JJ.DATE :30[th] August 2010 P.C. Heard. Perused Motion. 2For the reasons stated in the affidavit, appeal is restored to file subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- to be deposited with the High Court Law Library, Original Side within two weeks from today failing which the motion shall deem to have been rejected without further reference to this Court. 3Time to remove office objections is extended by four weeks from today, failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to this Court. 4Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of this order with no order as to costs. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [V C DAGA, J]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.