Case LawHigh Court › In Liquidation v. Deputy Commissioner Of...

In Liquidation v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2-2-2 International Taxation

High Court 22 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
In Liquidation v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2-2-2 International Taxation
Date of order
22 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In In Liquidation v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2-2-2 International Taxation, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: 5.The petition shall stand disposed of on the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~147 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7480/2024 NORTEL NETWORKS SINGAPORE PTE LIMITED IN LIQUIDATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Mr. Nikhil Agarwal, Mr. Puru Medhira and Mr. Nishank Vashistha, Advocates. versus % DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2-2-2 INTERNATIONAL TAXATION .. Respondent Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. Anant Mann, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R 22.05.2024 1.The solitary relief which is claimed in the instant writ petition reads as follows:- “(i) Issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent to dispose the rectification application dated 04.04.2022 within a period of four weeks by allowing the claim of additional interest under Section 244A(1A) of the Act, and release consequential refunds within a period of 4 weeks.” 2.Undisputedly, the rectification petition has been pending right from 04 April 2022. 3.In view of the aforesaid, Mr. Bhatia, learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that the said application shall be duly examined and disposed of in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The statement so made is recorded and accepted. 4.We, additionally, provide that in case rectification is granted, the respondent shall also bear in consideration the provisions of Section 244A(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [„Act’] and the asserted claim of interest as raised. 5.The petition shall stand disposed of on the above terms. 6.All rights and contentions of respective parties are kept open. YASHWANT VARMA, J MAY 22, 2024/RW AMIT BANSAL, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan