In In The Case Of Cit v. Apar Industries Ltd., Reported In [2010] 323, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present Appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1860 OF 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax -4Vs.M/s.Dresdner Klienwort Wasserstein----
)..Appellant
)..Respondents
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 10/1/2011.
PC
1Counsel on both sides state that the question raised in this appeal is covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court
in the case of CIT Vs. Apar Industries Ltd., reported in [2010] 323
ITR 411 (Bom). For the reasons stated therein, the present Appeal is also dismissed.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue