In The Decision Reported In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Varghese
High Court
17 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
In The Decision Reported In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Varghese
Date of order
17 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In In The Decision Reported In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Varghese, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Varghese Mani [(2001) 252 ITR 735], we allow the appeal by reversing the orderof the Tribunal on the question raised.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
THURSDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2008 / 27TH POUSHA 1929
ITA.No. 43 of 2001()
--------------------
ITA.457/COCH/1993 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:-
----------------------------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SC FOR IT
SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/APPELLANT:-
-------------------------------------------------------------
SHRI.C.L.ANAD,
ANAND HOUSE, M.G. ROAD,ERNAKULAM.
BY
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 17/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR&
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ.
======================
I.T.A.No. 43 of 2001.
======================
C.N.Ramachandran Nair, J.
J U D G M E N T
Since the issue is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court
in the decision reported in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Varghese
Mani [(2001) 252 ITR 735], we allow the appeal by reversing the orderof the Tribunal on the question raised.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.
kvs/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue