In The Matter Between Pr. Commissioner Of Income – Tax – 2 … v. Bank Of India …
High Court
01 Nov 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
In The Matter Between Pr. Commissioner Of Income – Tax – 2 … v. Bank Of India …
Date of order
01 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In In The Matter Between Pr. Commissioner Of Income – Tax – 2 … v. Bank Of India …, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1379 OF 2017
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.734 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax – 2
… Applicant
In the matter betweenPr. Commissioner of Income – Tax – 2… AppellantVs.Bank of India… Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Applicant.Mr. Subhash S. Shetty for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.
1[st ] NOVEMBER, 2017
DATE :
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. In view of the averments made in the affidavit in support, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay of 24 days. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(A.K. MENON, J)
(A.S. OKA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue