Case LawHigh Court › In The Matter Between : Raza Hussein Muk...

In The Matter Between : Raza Hussein Mukhi & Ors v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 16(1), Mumbai & Anr

High Court 09 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
In The Matter Between : Raza Hussein Mukhi & Ors v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 16(1), Mumbai & Anr
Date of order
09 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In In The Matter Between : Raza Hussein Mukhi & Ors v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 16(1), Mumbai & Anr, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.Having heard learned counsel for the parties and ondue consideration, we allow the prayer made in the interimapplication by condoning the delay, if any, in filing theinterim application.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. INT. APPLICATION NO. 1096 OF 2020ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 493 OF 2002 Yasmin Ali Nemazi .. Applicant In the Matter Between:Raza Hussein Mukhi & Ors.VsAsstt. Commissioner of Income TaxCircle 16(1), Mumbai & Anr. .. Appellant .. Respondents ................... Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Applicant Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Applicant Ms. Swapna Gokhale h/f Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents Ms. Swapna Gokhale h/f Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents ................... CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 09, 2021. P.C.: Heard Mr. Jasani, learned counsel for the applicant andMs. Gokhale, learned counsel holding brief for Mr. SureshKumar, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This interim application has been filed for allowingamendment to the related income tax appeal in terms of theschedule of amendment appended to the interim application. 3.It is stated that the first appellant Raza Hussien Mukhihad died in London on 19.05.2019. Therefore, his name isrequired to be struck off from the list of appellants. 4.Having heard learned counsel for the parties and ondue consideration, we allow the prayer made in the interimapplication by condoning the delay, if any, in filing theinterim application. 5.Name of appellant No. 1 Raza Hussien Mukhi shall bedeleted from the list of appellants in the cause title of therelated income tax appeal. 6.Interim application is disposed of. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ] Digitallysigned byRavindraRavindra M.AmberkarM.AmberkarDate:2021.02.1016:40:01+0530
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan