Case Law › High Court › In The Matter Between -Reuters India Pvt...

In The Matter Between -Reuters India Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle – 15(1), New Delhi

High Court 17 Jul 2015 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

17 Jul 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In In The Matter Between -Reuters India Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle – 15(1), New Delhi, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2022 OF 2015 INWRIT PETITION NO. 4562 OF 2007 Thomson Reuters India Pvt. Ltd. … Applicant In the matter between -Reuters India Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income TaxCircle – 15(1), New Delhi. … Respondent Mr.Atul Jasani for the applicant. Mr.Arvind Pinto for the respondent. CORAM: M.S. SANKLECHA & N.M. JAMDAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH JULY, 2015 P.C.: The civil application is filed by the applicant/petitioner to amend the cause title of the petition to reflect the new name of petitioner. 2The civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and ( c ). bsb 2 3The petitioner will serve the amended copy of the petition upon the respondent. ( N. M. JAMDAR, J. ) ( M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.