In The Matter Between v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
27 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
In The Matter Between v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In In The Matter Between v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Chittewan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.24220 OF 2022INWRIT PETITION NO.2077 OF 2022
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-4(3)(1) …Applicant
In the matter between:
LKP Securities Limited …Petitioner Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
-4(3)(1) and Others …Respondents
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Applicant.Ms. Dinkle Hariya i/b Ms. Namrata S. Kasale for theRespondent/Petitioner.
***
CORAM :DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR &ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 29 JULY 2022
P. C. :
. By virtue of an Order dated 4 July 2022, a direction was issued toRespondent No.3 for de novo consideration of the matters after grantingan opportunity of personal hearing to the Assessee-Petitioner and thatOrder has to be passed within four weeks. Today, Mr. Kumar, learnedCounsel for the Applicant-Respondent No.3 seeks extension of time. TheApplicant is granted two months time to comply with the Order dated4 July 2022.
2The Interim Application is disposed of, accordingly, in terms ofprayer clause (a).
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.)
RAJESHDigitally signed byRAJESH VASANTVASANTCHITTEWANCHITTEWANDate: 2022.08.0110:50:59 +0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue