Case LawHigh Court › In The Matter Between v. Indian Oil Corp...

In The Matter Between v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. …

High Court 29 Jul 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
In The Matter Between v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. …
Date of order
29 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In In The Matter Between v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. …, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 241 OF 2019 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(L) NO. 1276 OF 2014Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14,Mumbai.…Applicant. In the matter between Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10.…Appellant.VersusIndian Oil Corporation Ltd.…Respondent Respondent Mr. Arvind Pinto, advocate for applicant. Mr. Atul Jesani, advocate for respondent. CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 29TH JULY, 2019. P.C.: 1.This Motion is taken out for restoration of the IncomeTax Appeal, which came to be dismissed for non-removal of theoffice objections. There is considerable delay in filing this Motion.The prayer is therefore, made for condonation of the said delay. 2 Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties, in the larger interest of justice, Income Tax Appeal is restored to file, aftercondoning the delay. 3 All office objections shall be removed within 2 weeks from today, failing which the Income Tax Appeal shall standdismissed for default without further reference to the court. 4Looking to the gross delay, the applicant shall pay costof Rs. 25,000/- to the respondent. 5The Notice of Motion is allowed on the above terms anddisposed of accordingly. ( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ) ( AKIL KURESHI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan