In The Matter Between v. Sandeep K. Shinde, Jj. Date :- 21St June, 2018
High Court
21 Jun 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
In The Matter Between v. Sandeep K. Shinde, Jj. Date :- 21St June, 2018
Date of order
21 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
1996-97, 2000-01
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In In The Matter Between v. Sandeep K. Shinde, Jj. Date :- 21St June, 2018, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Rane
* 1/2 * CHS-540-2018 (SR.19)CHS-541-2018 (SR.20)Thursday, 21.6.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 540 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 103 OF 2014
ALONGWITHCHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 541 OF 2018IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 669 OF 2014
Toyo Engineering CorporationC/o. Bilimoria Mehta and Co.
...Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Toyo Engineering Corporation….Applicantvs.The Deputy Director of Income-Tax, (International TaxationRg.,2(1), Mumbai)….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/by. MINT AND CONFRERES, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant.
Mr. Arvind Pinto, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-21ST JUNE, 2018.
P.C. :--
P.C. :--
1.These two Chamber Summonses have been taken out to amend the Appeal Memo filed challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 1996-97 and Assessment Year 2000-01.
2.The Chamber Summons merely seek to correct the inadvertent error in mentioning the Income Tax Appeal Number before the Tribunal and the Assessment Year involved in the cause-title. In the above view, the Chamber Summonses are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. Amended copy to be served on the other side immediately thereafter. Re-verification is dispensed with.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.