In The Matter Betweenbank Of Baroda, Mumbai v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle-2 (1)(1), Mumbai
High Court
26 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
In The Matter Betweenbank Of Baroda, Mumbai v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle-2 (1)(1), Mumbai
Date of order
26 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In In The Matter Betweenbank Of Baroda, Mumbai v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle-2 (1)(1), Mumbai, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
SANTOSHSUBHASHKULKARNI
Digitally signed bySANTOSH SUBHASHKULKARNIDate: 2022.02.2811:20:33 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1561 OF 2020
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 303 OF 2019
Bank of Baroda, Mumbai
...Applicant
In the matter betweenBank of Baroda, Mumbai
...Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Circle-2 (1)(1), Mumbai
...Respondent
AND
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1562 OF 2020
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 385 OF 2019
AND
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1564 OF 2020
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 490 OF 2019
AND
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1566 OF 2020
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 491 OF 2019
Mr. Atul K. Jasani, for the Applicant/Appellant.
Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondent.
CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJDATED:26[th] FEBRUARY, 2022
-PC:
1.Heard Mr. Jasani and also considered the applications.
2.Leave to amend the appeals, since the appeals itself are
pending for admission, is granted.
3.Amendment be carried out and amended memo of appeal
to be served within three weeks from today.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.][K. R. SHRIRAM, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue