In The Matter Betweenm/S. Vodafone India Limited v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune & Ors
High Court
21 Jun 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
In The Matter Betweenm/S. Vodafone India Limited v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune & Ors
Date of order
21 Jun 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In In The Matter Betweenm/S. Vodafone India Limited v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune & Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
R.M. AMBERKAR
(Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 207 OF 2019INWRIT PETITION NO. 1103 OF 2019
The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Pune & Ors. .. Applicants
In the Matter BetweenM/s. Vodafone India Limited.. Petitioner
Vs
The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Pune & Ors. .. Respondents
...................
Mr. Sham Walve for the Applicants Mr. Sham Walve for the Applicants
Mr. Deepak Chopra a/w Mr. Atul. K. Jasani for the OriginalPetitionerMr. Deepak Chopra a/w Mr. Atul. K. Jasani for the OriginalPetitioner
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
P.C.:
DATE : JUNE 21, 2019
IN CHAMBER AT 3.00 P.M.
1.Pursuant to our last order dated 7.6.2019, learnedcounsel for the parties pointed out that refund of sum of Rs.19.97 Crores (rounded off) with interest has been releasedtoday itself. This takes care of substantial grievance of thepetitioner. However, question of unpaid amount of Rs. 7.56Crores (rounded off) still survives. It appears that out of thesaid amount, there is rectification proceedings concerning ofsum of Rs. 2.47 Crores (rounded off) is still not disposed of.In other words, there should be no impediment in releasing
the rest of the amounts. The Income Tax Department shallprocess the refund manually and pass necessary refundorders as required preferably within two weeks from today.With this direction, Notice of Motion is disposed of.
2.If the petitioner wishes to challenge the very circularwhich is base of the action by the Department, it would beopen for the petitioner to prefer fresh proceedings.
[ SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.