Case LawHigh Court › In The Matter Betweenm/S. Vodafone India...

In The Matter Betweenm/S. Vodafone India Limited v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune & Ors

High Court 21 Jun 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
In The Matter Betweenm/S. Vodafone India Limited v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune & Ors
Date of order
21 Jun 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In In The Matter Betweenm/S. Vodafone India Limited v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune & Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 207 OF 2019INWRIT PETITION NO. 1103 OF 2019 The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Pune & Ors. .. Applicants In the Matter BetweenM/s. Vodafone India Limited.. Petitioner Vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Pune & Ors. .. Respondents ................... Mr. Sham Walve for the Applicants Mr. Sham Walve for the Applicants Mr. Deepak Chopra a/w Mr. Atul. K. Jasani for the OriginalPetitionerMr. Deepak Chopra a/w Mr. Atul. K. Jasani for the OriginalPetitioner ................... CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. P.C.: DATE : JUNE 21, 2019 IN CHAMBER AT 3.00 P.M. 1.Pursuant to our last order dated 7.6.2019, learnedcounsel for the parties pointed out that refund of sum of Rs.19.97 Crores (rounded off) with interest has been releasedtoday itself. This takes care of substantial grievance of thepetitioner. However, question of unpaid amount of Rs. 7.56Crores (rounded off) still survives. It appears that out of thesaid amount, there is rectification proceedings concerning ofsum of Rs. 2.47 Crores (rounded off) is still not disposed of.In other words, there should be no impediment in releasing the rest of the amounts. The Income Tax Department shallprocess the refund manually and pass necessary refundorders as required preferably within two weeks from today.With this direction, Notice of Motion is disposed of. 2.If the petitioner wishes to challenge the very circularwhich is base of the action by the Department, it would beopen for the petitioner to prefer fresh proceedings. [ SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan