In The Matter Betweenpfizer Limtied v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 8(2
High Court
22 Mar 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
In The Matter Betweenpfizer Limtied v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 8(2
Date of order
22 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In In The Matter Betweenpfizer Limtied v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 8(2, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.495 OF 2013
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.404 OF 2013
Mukesh Shah.
..Applicant.
In the matter betweenPfizer Limtied.
..Appellant.
v.
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 8(2)...rESPONDENT.
Mr.P.J.Pardiwala,Sr.Advocate with A.K.Jasani for the Appellant.Mr.Tejveer Singh for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 22nd March, 2013.
PC:
For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support, delay of
one day in filing the appeal is condoned.
2)Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue