In The Matter Betweenramona Pinto v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 23(3), Mumbai & Anr
High Court
26 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
In The Matter Betweenramona Pinto v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 23(3), Mumbai & Anr
Date of order
26 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In In The Matter Betweenramona Pinto v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 23(3), Mumbai & Anr, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
SANTOSHSUBHASHKULKARNI
Digitally signed bySANTOSHSUBHASHKULKARNIDate: 2022.02.2811:29:14 +0530
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2239 OF 2020
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2610 OF 2018
Ramona Pinto
...Applicant
In the matter betweenRamona Pinto...Appellant
Versus
Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax 23(3), Mumbai & anr.
...Respondents
Mr. Nitesh Joshi, i/b Mr. Atul K. Jasani, for the Applicant/Appellant.
Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondents.
CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJDATED:26[th] FEBRUARY, 2022
-PC:
1.This application is for early hearing of the appeal.
2.For the reasons mentioned therein, appeal be listed on 24[th]
March 2022 for final hearing.
3.Application disposed.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
[K. R. SHRIRAM, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue