In The Matter Of Between : Matrix Marketing, Mumbai v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 21(2), Mumbai
High Court
06 Aug 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
In The Matter Of Between : Matrix Marketing, Mumbai v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 21(2), Mumbai
Date of order
06 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In In The Matter Of Between : Matrix Marketing, Mumbai v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 21(2), Mumbai, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1554 OF 2012IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO..982 OF 2012
Tushar Bhupendra Avlani.
..Applicant.
In the matter of between :Matrix Marketing, Mumbai.Vs.
The Joint Commissioner of Income tax,Circle 21(2), Mumbai.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Appellant.Mr.Tejveer Singh for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR &
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 6[th] August, 2012
PC:
This is the appellant's notice of motion for seeking condonation of delay for 1225 days in filing the appeal. Although the delay is not considerable, there is a valid explanation for the same.
2)The order of the Tribunal challenged in this appeal is dated 21[st] May, 2008. It was received by the appellant on 25[th] October, 2008. On 13[th] April, 2009, the appellant filed Miscellaneous Application No.124/Mum./2009 under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act for correcting certain mistakes.
ASN
3)The last date for filing this appeal was 22[nd] February 2009. However, the order in the said Misc. Application was passed only on 20[th] August, 2010. By a letter dated 19[th] April, 2012 addressed to the Registrar of the Tribunal the appellant's Chartered Accountant stated that they had not received the order in the said Miscellaneous Application. By a further letter dated 19[th] April, 2012 addressed to the Registrar of the Tribunal the appellant once again stated that it had not received the order in the Miscellenous Application and informed the Tribunal of their change in address. Ultimately, only on 7[th] May, 2012 the appellant obtained a copy of the order. The appeal was thereafter, filed on 2[nd] July, 2012. In these circumstances, it is unfair to dismiss the appeal merely on the ground of delay.
4)The Notice of motion is therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) and stands disposed of.
( M.S. SANKLECHA, J. )
( S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.