In The Matter Of Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax-1, Chandigarh v. M/S Vardhman Chemtech Private Limited, Chandigarh, Passed In
High Court
26 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
In The Matter Of Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax-1, Chandigarh v. M/S Vardhman Chemtech Private Limited, Chandigarh, Passed In
Date of order
26 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In In The Matter Of Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax-1, Chandigarh v. M/S Vardhman Chemtech Private Limited, Chandigarh, Passed In, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: M/s Vardhman Chemtech Private Limited, Chandigarh, passed in ITA No.322 of 2016, decided on 28.08.2018. | In the circumstances, the petition stands dismissed in thesame terms as in ITA No.322 of 2016.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
209IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No.502 of 2018 (O&M)Date of decision : 26.02.2020
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2,Chandigarh
...... Appellant
VerTSU
M/S Kotla Hydro Power Pvt. Ltd.
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARTHON'BLE MR.JUSTICEAVNEESH JHINGAN
///
Present :-Mrs. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocatefor the applicant-appellant.
Ms. Radhika Suri, Sr. Advocate with|Mr. M.S.Kanda, Advocatefor the respondent.
///
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
CM3219053CI]32019
This application has been filed for the dismissal of the appeal
filed by the appellant in terms of the circular issued by the Central Board
of Direct Taxes.
For the reasons recorded, the application is allowed. Maincase is taken up on board today itself,
Main case
Learned counsel for the appellant states that the facts of thepresent case are covered against the revenue by the decision of this Court
in the matter of Principal Commissioner ofIncome Tax-1, Chandigarh
Vs. M/s Vardhman Chemtech Private Limited, Chandigarh, passed in
ITA No.322 of 2016, decided on 28.08.2018. |
In the circumstances, the petition stands dismissed in thesame terms as in ITA No.322 of 2016.
Since the main case has been decided, the pending civilmiscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(AJAY TEWARI )JUDGE
26.02.2020pooja sharma-l
( AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable |
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.