In Thehigh Courtof Delhiat New Delhi + W.p.(C) 5872/2025 300Plus Innovative Solutions v. The Income Tax Officer Through
High Court
06 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
In Thehigh Courtof Delhiat New Delhi + W.p.(C) 5872/2025 300Plus Innovative Solutions v. The Income Tax Officer Through
Date of order
06 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In In Thehigh Courtof Delhiat New Delhi + W.p.(C) 5872/2025 300Plus Innovative Solutions v. The Income Tax Officer Through, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: 6.The petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~96
*INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+W.P.(C) 5872/2025300PLUS INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS.....Petitioner
Through:Mr. Mukesh Chand, Adv.Versus
THE INCOME TAX OFFICERThrough:
.....RespondentMr. Siddhartha Sinha, Adv.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAO R D E R%05.05.2025
1.Issue notice.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue accepts notice.
3.The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as
under:
“1.To directing the respondent to decide the rectificationapplication filed on 02.04.2024, 06.03.2025 and 23.04.2025for the AY 2018-19.”
4.The petitioner is essentially aggrieved that its applications filed under
Section 154 of the Act have not been considered and disposed of.
5.In view of the above, we direct that the concerned authority shallconsider the petitioner’s applications as expeditiously as possible, preferablywithin a period of six weeks from date, and communicate its decision to thepetitioner.
6.The petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
MAY 5, 2025/‘gsr’
TEJAS KARIA, JClick here to check corrigendum, if any
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue