In View Of The Above As Well As The Judgements Of The Apex Courtin United Bank Of India v. Digitally Signed By :- Amit Kumar Mishra High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad
High Court
31 Jul 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
In View Of The Above As Well As The Judgements Of The Apex Courtin United Bank Of India v. Digitally Signed By :- Amit Kumar Mishra High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad
Date of order
31 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In In View Of The Above As Well As The Judgements Of The Apex Courtin United Bank Of India v. Digitally Signed By :- Amit Kumar Mishra High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal under Section 253 of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: 36),the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 3379 of 2025
Petitioner :- Hoob Lal Prajapati
Respondent :- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Aaykar BhawanCounsel for Petitioner :- Bhola Nath Yadav,Priyavrat TripathiCounsel for Respondent :- Ankur Agarwal,Gaurav Mahajan
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
At the very outset, Shri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for therespondent raises a preliminary objection with regard tomaintainability of the writ petition on the ground that against theimpugned order, the petitioner has equally, efficacious alternativeremedy of filing second appeal under section 253 of the IncomeTax Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said fact.
In view of the above as well as the judgements of the Apex Courtin United Bank of India Vs. Satyawati Tondon & Others [(2010)8 SCC 110] (paragraph no. 43), Radha Krishan Industries Vs.State of Himachal Pradesh & Others [(2021) 6 SCC 771](paragraph nos. 27.3 and 27.5) and Varimadugu Obi Reddy Vs. B.Sreenivasulu & Others [(2023) 2 SCC 168] (paragraph no. 36),the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
The Office shall return the certified copies of the impugned ordersto the learned counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the truecopies of the same.
Order Date :- 1.8.2025Amit Mishra
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue