Case Law › High Court › Inco0Me Tax 8, Mumbai v. M/S Natural Gem...

Inco0Me Tax 8, Mumbai v. M/S Natural Gems Ltd Mumbai

High Court 18 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

18 Feb 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Inco0Me Tax 8, Mumbai v. M/S Natural Gems Ltd Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: On failure to remove officeobjections, appeal to stand dismissed withoutfurther order from this Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3348 OF 2008IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.778 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Inco0me Tax 8, Mumbai ..Appellant -versus M/s Natural Gems Ltd Mumbai .. Respondents Mr.P.S.Sahadevanfor the appellant CORAM: F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 18 th February,2009P.C.1. Considering cause shown, delay condoned.Office to register the appeal on appellantsremoving the office objections if any, within fourweeks from today. On failure to remove officeobjections, appeal to stand dismissed withoutfurther order from this Court. (R.S.MOHITE, J) (F.I.REBELLO, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.