Income Tax-1, Delhi v. M/S C.p. And Associates Pvt. Ltd
High Court
12 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Income Tax-1, Delhi v. M/S C.p. And Associates Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
12 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Income Tax-1, Delhi v. M/S C.p. And Associates Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Issue: While testing the assumption of jurisdiction based on whether incriminating material belonging to the respondent-assessee had been recovered in the course of the search, that aspect has been answered in the negative.
Decision: 3.The appeal fails and shall stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~85
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 491/2024
PR. COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX-1, DELHI .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Ms. Easha Kadian, Advocates.
versus
M/S C.P. AND ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R% 12.09.2024CM APPL. 53371/2024 (195 days delay in refilling)
Bearing in mind the disclosures made, the delay of 195 days in
refilling the appeal is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
ITA 491/2024
1.The Principal Commissioner impugns the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [‘Tribunal’] dated 06 September 2023. We note that the Tribunal has taken into consideration that assessment under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’] was in respect of an unabated assessment. While testing the assumption of jurisdiction based on whether incriminating material belonging to the respondent-assessee had been recovered in the course of the search, that aspect has been answered in the negative.
2.In view of the above and for reasons assigned by us while
dismissing the appeal of the Revenue in Principal Commissioner of
Income Tax vs. M/s C.P. and Associates Pvt. Ltd. on 11 September 2024, we find no justification to interfere with the order impugned.
3.The appeal fails and shall stand dismissed.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
SEPTEMBER 12, 2024/vp
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.