In Income Tax 3 v. M/S Shapoorji Pallonji Power, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal stands dismissed accordingly. -2- (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Appeal No.1415 of 2007
The Commissioner of
Income Tax 3 ..Appellant
vs.
M/s Shapoorji Pallonji Power
Co.Ltd. ...Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.P.Kakani with Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 6th August, 2008
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
6th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and the
learned Counsel for the respondent. We have perused the
order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 21st
June, 2007. From perusal of the reasoning from para 4
onwards it is clear that the Tribunal has merely followed
the findings of fact recorded by CIT (Appeals) and
concurred with the same. It is only a finding of fact and
there is no substantial question of law involved in the
above appeal. Appeal stands dismissed accordingly.
-2-
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue