Income Tax, Aayakar Bhavan,Patto, Panaji Goa v. M/S. Ramacanta Velingkar Minerals, Shop
High Court
04 Aug 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Income Tax, Aayakar Bhavan,Patto, Panaji Goa v. M/S. Ramacanta Velingkar Minerals, Shop
Date of order
04 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Income Tax, Aayakar Bhavan,Patto, Panaji Goa v. M/S. Ramacanta Velingkar Minerals, Shop, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: This Tax Appeal accordingly failsand is hereby dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Aura
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 59 OF 2018
The Principal Commissioner of
Income Tax, Aayakar Bhavan,Patto, Panaji Goa.
Versus
...Appellant
1. M/s. Ramacanta Velingkar Minerals, Shop No.14, 1[st] floor,
Navelkar Trade Centre,
Panaji-Goa.
...Respondent
Mrs. Susan Linhares, Advocate for the Appellant.Mr. S. M. Singbal, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH &M. S. SONAK , JJDATED: 4th AUGUST, 2021
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER M. S. SONAK, J).
Heard Ms. Susan Linhares, the learned counsel for the
1.appellant and Mr. S. M. Singbal for the respondent.
2.The learned counsel for the parties agree that the issueinvolved in this appeal is covered by our Judgment and Orderdated 9/12/2020 in Tax Appeal Nos.17, 25, 26 and 37 of 2015.Mr. Singbal points out that the present appeal involves the sameissue, but is in respect of the subsequent assessment year.
3.Accordingly, for the reasons set out in our Judgment andOrder dated 9/12/2020 in Tax Appeal Nos.17, 25, 26 and 37 of
2015, the substantial questions of law framed in this appeal aredecided against the Revenue. This Tax Appeal accordingly failsand is hereby dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
M. S. SONAK, J
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J
MARIA AURA Digitally signed by MARIA AURA PEREIRA PEREIRADate: 2021.08.07 10:13:24 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue