In Income Tax Appeal (L) v. A.c.i.t. 19(2), Mumbai, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1012 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2636 OF 2018
Shri Manohar P. Kanungo….Applicant/Appellant vs A.C.I.T. 19(2), Mumbai...Respondents
None for Applicant.
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & S.C.GUPTE, JJ.
DATE : 8 FEBRUARY 2019
P.C.:
When called out, none present for the Applicant. The notice ofmotion is dismissed for default.
(S.C. GUPTE, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.