Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Appeal (L) v. Shri J.m.scindi...

Income Tax Appeal (L) v. Shri J.m.scindia Huf

High Court 28 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax Appeal (L) v. Shri J.m.scindia Huf
Date of order
28 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Income Tax Appeal (L) v. Shri J.m.scindia Huf, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.79 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2942 OF 2007The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant Vs. Shri J.M.Scindia HUF.. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantMr.A.K.Jasani i.b Mr.J.D.Mistry for Respt P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Bythis notice of motion, the appellant is seekingcondonation of 709 days delay caused in filing theappeal. 2. Perused the affidavit in support of the noticeof motion. The appeal is against the order dated29th July, 2006. The Commissioner of Income Taxhad granted approval for filing an appeal on 20thDecember, 2006 and the appeal came to be filed on19th December, 2007. We are not satisfied withthe reasons given for condonation of delay. Thereasons given for delay that for reasons beyondthe control of the appellant’s office does notappear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, noticeof motion stands dismissed. 3. In view of dismissal of the notice of motion,Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 2942 of 2007 alsostands dismissed. (A.V.Nirgude, J)(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan