Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Appeal (Lodging) v. Dhiraj Si...

Income Tax Appeal (Lodging) v. Dhiraj Singh Thakur &Kamal Khata, J.j.31[St] March, 2023

High Court 31 Mar 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax Appeal (Lodging) v. Dhiraj Singh Thakur &Kamal Khata, J.j.31[St] March, 2023
Date of order
31 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Income Tax Appeal (Lodging) v. Dhiraj Singh Thakur &Kamal Khata, J.j.31[St] March, 2023, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

SHRADDHAKAMLESHTALEKAR Digitally signed bySHRADDHAKAMLESH TALEKARDate: 2023.04.0611:53:55 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION No.251 OF 2023 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 39640 OF 2022 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6… Applicant/Appellant Versus Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd..…Respondent ***** Ms.Swapna Gokhale, Advocate for applicant. Mr.Atul K. Jasani, Advocate for respondents. CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR &KAMAL KHATA, J.J.31[st] MARCH, 2023. DATE : P C : 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2.Issue notice to the respondent. 3.Mr.Jasani waives service of notice for the respondent. Mr.Jasani states that he has no objection to condone the delay. 4.In view of the averments made in the application, the same isallowed. Delay of 18 days in preferring the appeal is condoned.5.Interim application is disposed of. allowed. Delay of 18 days in preferring the appeal is condoned.5.Interim application is disposed of. 6.The appeal be listed in due course. [ KAMAL KHATA, J. ] [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan