Income Tax Appeal Lodging v. Mr.a. Hatim, For The
High Court
24 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax Appeal Lodging v. Mr.a. Hatim, For The
Date of order
24 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Income Tax Appeal Lodging v. Mr.a. Hatim, For The, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.486 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.220 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax.Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Rainbow Ink & Varnish Mfg. Co.Ltd.Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
Mr.A. Hatim, for the Respondent
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Delay is of less than 200 days. Considering the practical difficulties which the Department was facing including referring the matter to the Law
Department, Government of India for drafting the
Appeal Memo and considering the affidavit in support
of the Motion, in our opinion, the cause shown would
amount to sufficient cause. Hence delay condoned.
Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
Office to register the Appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue