Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Appeal Lodg v. M/S.cifco Ltd

Income Tax Appeal Lodg v. M/S.cifco Ltd

High Court 08 Sep 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax Appeal Lodg v. M/S.cifco Ltd
Date of order
08 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Income Tax Appeal Lodg v. M/S.cifco Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2711 OF 2008IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODG.NO. 1032 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income-tax-3...AppellantVs.M/s.CIFCO Ltd...Respondent -- Shri Vimal Gupta i/by P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.Ms P.V. Shukla i/by Shri S.G. Dalal for the Respondent. -- CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J DATE : 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. There is no serious objection for condonation of delay.Delay is explained reasonably and sufficiently in the affidavit insupport of the Notice of Motion. Consequently, the Notice ofMotion for condonation of delay of 56 days in filing the appeal isallowed. The delay is condoned. Notice of Motion accordinglystands disposed of. 2.Appeal to be listed for hearing on admission on 29[th]September, 2008. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan