Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Appeal Lodg v. Shri Vipul Meh...

Income Tax Appeal Lodg v. Shri Vipul Mehta

High Court 07 Jul 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax Appeal Lodg v. Shri Vipul Mehta
Date of order
07 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Income Tax Appeal Lodg v. Shri Vipul Mehta, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDENotice of Motion No.1842 of 2008 In Income Tax Appeal Lodg.No.1394 of 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-14,MumbaiAppellant Vs. Shri Vipul Mehta Respondent Mr.Suraj M. Shah for appellant. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. July 7, 2008 P.C. Revenue and hence this Notice of Motion forcondonation of delay. .Mr.Shah states that notice was given to therespondent - assessee - company clearly informingtoday’s date and he has already filed anaffidavit-of-service on record. . We have perused the affidavit in support of this Motion filed by Shri M.S.Menon, ITO-14(1)-1 andwe are satisfied that the delay caused in filing this appeal (142 days) has been properly explained and thesame deserves to be condoned. .Hence the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). .Appeal to be listed before the appropriateBench. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan