Income Tax Appeal v. M/S Nirwan Charitable Trust
High Court
04 Nov 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. M/S Nirwan Charitable Trust
Date of order
04 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Income Tax Appeal v. M/S Nirwan Charitable Trust, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR --------------------------------------------------------
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 171 of 2008
V/S
M/S NIRWAN CHARITABLE TRUST
Mr. KK BISSA, for the appellant / petitioner
Date of Order : 4.11.2008
HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI,J.
ORDER
-----
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
The learned Tribunal has already found regardingthe investment in the building that deduction for personalsupervision to the extent of 10% is to be allowed if theAssessing Officer finds that construction was got doneunder self-supervision. Thus, it doesn't leave any furthergrievance for the Revenue to ventilate in this appeal asotherwise the valuation as determined by the ValuationOfficer has been taken with other admissible deductions.Then so far as the alleged payment of remunerations todirectors is concerned, it has been found that the books ofaccounts have not reflected any such remunerations havingbeen paid to them. It has been found that there is neitherany documentary evidence, nor any statement of anybody inthis regard. Thus, it was found that there is no iota of
evidence. In our view, this again is a pure finding of fact.
Thus, the appeal does not involve any substantialquestion of law. The same is, therefore, dismissed.
( KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J.
/tarun/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.