Case Law › High Court › Income Tax Appeal v. Range 8(2), Mumbai...

Income Tax Appeal v. Range 8(2), Mumbai & Anr

High Court 04 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Aug 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Income Tax Appeal v. Range 8(2), Mumbai & Anr, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL No. 217 OF 2007 Monsanto India Ltd.AppellantVs.Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax,RespondentsRange 8(2), Mumbai & Anr.Mr. Firoze Andhyanujina i/b Ms. Pallavi Divekar, forthe appellant. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondent. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, &A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.DATE : AUGUST 4, 2008. PC :- .Admit, on the questions of law framed in thememo of appeal. Sd/-[ BILAL NAZKI, J.] Sd/-[ A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.