Income Tax Appeal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Dehradun
High Court
20 Dec 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Dehradun
Date of order
20 Dec 2005
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Income Tax Appeal v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Dehradun, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT- NAINITAL.
Income Tax Appeal No. 22 of 2005
M/s R & B Falcon Drilling Co. As Agent of Mr. Michael Schmidt, ……. Appellant.
Vs.
The Commissioner of Income Tax Dehradun,
.….. Respondent.
Km. Krishi Shukla, Adv. & Sri Udyog Shukla, Advocate for the appellant, Sri S.K. Posti, learned counsel for the respondent.
Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.
Heard learned counsel for both the parties.
The assessee has filed the present appeal u/s 260A of Income Tax Act against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi for assessment year 1999-2000.
Though, several questions have been framed in the memo of appeal but in substance the only question involve in this appeal is that whether the amount paid to the assessee for off period salary shall be included in the income accrued in view of the explanation of Section 9(1) (ii) of the Act 1961?
Since the said question has already been decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal nos. 351-355 of 2005 with the connected Civil Appeals, Sedco Forex International Drill Inc. and ors. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun and another reported in Judgment Today 2005(9) SC 639, this appeal is decided on the same terms and conditions and the question is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. No order as to costs.
The appeal is decided accordingly.
(B.S. Verma, J.)
December 20, 2005:
SKS:
(M.M. Ghildiyal, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.