Income Tax Appeal v. Ashish Bajaj
High Court
23 Jul 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. Ashish Bajaj
Date of order
23 Jul 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Income Tax Appeal v. Ashish Bajaj, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Since no substantial question of law arises for consideration in this income tax appeal, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2015The Commissioner of Income Tax-Central, Nagpur
-vs-
Ashish Bajaj
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's ordersCourt's or Judge's Orders.or directions and Registrar's orders.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.S.N.Bhattad and Mr.Abhishek Bhoot, counsel for the appellant.
CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK &A.M.BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 23.07.2015.
Heard.
On hearing the learned counsel for the Department and on a perusal of the judgment rendered by this Court on 29/10/2010 in Income Tax Appeal No.36 of 1995, we find that the issue involved in this case stands answered against the Department by the said judgment. In this case also the assessment was complete on 01/08/2006 and the search was conducted on 13/08/2008 and therefore, the notice and action under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act was bad in law.
Since no substantial question of law arises for consideration in this income tax appeal, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue