Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Appeal v. Hindustan Zinc Ltd....

Income Tax Appeal v. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. , Udaipur

High Court 25 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. , Udaipur
Date of order
25 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Income Tax Appeal v. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. , Udaipur, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 33 of 2008 V/S HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD. , UDAIPUR Mr. KK BISSA, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 25.2.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI SANGEET LODHA,J. ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The only ground given is that in view of theamended provision of Section 251(1)(a) the learnedCommissioner Income Tax had no power to remand back thematter to the assessing officer. We have considered the submission, and find thatthe provisions of Section 251(1)(a) have undergone a changetaking away the power of remand, and the amendment has beenmade effective from 1.6.2001. A look at the order of thelearned Commissioner shows that the appeal was institutedbefore him way back on 25.4.2001. Obviously, therefore, thesubsequent amendment could not have the effect of adverselyaffecting the appeal of the assessee which was alreadypending on the date of coming into force of the amended provision. In that view of the matter, we do not find anyforce in the appeal. The same is, therefore, dismissed. ( SANGEET LODHA ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /sushil/
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan