Income Tax Appeal v. Baker Hughes Singapore Pte
High Court
13 Mar 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. Baker Hughes Singapore Pte
Date of order
13 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Income Tax Appeal v. Baker Hughes Singapore Pte, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: This appeal is also being dismissed as per the order dated 25.07.2023, passed in ITA No.09 of 2023. ______________ RITU BAHRI, C.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHANDAT NAINITALHON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. RITU BAHRI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAKESH THAPLIYAL 13[th] MARCH, 2024
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 52 OF 2022Commissioner of Income Tax, (International Taxation) -3, New Delhi
…Appellant
Versus
Baker Hughes Singapore Pte.,
…Respondent : Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel. : Mr. Pulak Raj Mullick, learned counsel.
Counsel for the appellant. Counsel for respondent
JUDGMENT: (per Ms. Ritu Bahri, C.J.)
The issue involved in the present appeal has been duly considered by the Full Bench of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.40 of 2012, “Director of Income Tax International Taxation Vs. M/s Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd.”decided on 12.04.2019.
2. Learned counsel for the parties are not disputing the fact that in similar ITA No.09 of 2023, the similar issue has come up for consideration, keeping in view the Full Bench Judgment of Income Tax Appeal No.40 of 2012, “Director of Income Tax International Taxation Vs. M/s Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd.” has been dismissed.
3. This appeal is also being dismissed as per the order dated 25.07.2023, passed in ITA No.09 of 2023.
______________
RITU BAHRI, C.J.
Dt:13[th] March, 2024 NR/
__________________
RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.