Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Appeal v. Dated: August 23, 2...

Income Tax Appeal v. Dated: August 23, 2014

High Court 23 Aug 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. Dated: August 23, 2014
Date of order
23 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Income Tax Appeal v. Dated: August 23, 2014, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: The question of law, which has been projected in this Appeal, is whether the Assessee is entitled to the benefit of Section 80 IB of the Income Tax Act.

Decision: The Appeal will stand dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Income Tax Appeal No. 64 of 2010Dy. Commissioner Income Tax. ..… Appellant. Versus M/s J.P. Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Mohit Maulekhi, Advocate for the respondent. ..… Respondent. Dated: August 23, 2014 Coram :Hon’ble K.M. Joseph, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J.K.M. Joseph C.J. (oral) CLMA No. 9105/2014 (Application for Amendment) Correction application is allowed. Income Tax Appeal No. 64 of 2010 We also took up the matter for hearing itself. The question of law, which has been projected in this Appeal, is whether the Assessee is entitled to the benefit of Section 80 IB of the Income Tax Act. The issue does not appear to be res integra and it appears to be covered against the appellant, even according to the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, by virtue of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in ‘Income Tax Officer, Udaipur vs. Arihant Tiles & Marbles Pvt. Ltd.’, reported in 2010 (2) SCC, 699. There is also no dispute that this Court has answered the similar question of law in ITA No. 33 of 2009 ‘Commissioner of Income Tax, Haldwani vs. M/s Mallikarjun Georesources Associates’, dated 07.07.2011 against the appellant. In the light of the above two judgments, question of law is answered against the appellant. The Appeal will stand dismissed. (V.K. Bist, J.) (K.M. Joseph, C.J.) 23.08.2014
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan