In Income Tax Appeal v. Tax, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. [RIYAZ I.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sharayu Khot.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 776 OF 2002
M/s. Tigrania Ispat (P) Ltd.…Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner of Income-…Respondent
Tax
----------
None for the Appellant.
Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondent.
----------
CORAM :M.S. SANKLECHA &RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 19 January 2018
ORDER :
1.This Appeal was on board yesterday. None appears
in support of the Appeal. Consequently, the Appeal was kepttoday under the caption 'For Dismissal'.
1/2
914-ITXA-776-02.doc
2.Today also none appears for the Appellant. Itappears that the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting the
Appeal.
3.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.]
[M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
2/2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue