Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Appeal v. Date Of Order : 21....

Income Tax Appeal v. Date Of Order : 21.8.2008

High Court 21 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. Date Of Order : 21.8.2008
Date of order
21 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Income Tax Appeal v. Date Of Order : 21.8.2008, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Resultantly, the appeal, is dismissed, for theaforesaid reasons.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 78 of 2006 V/S Mr. K K BISSA, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. ANJAY KOTHARI, for the respondent Date of Order : 21.8.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI,J. ORDER Heard learned counsel for the parties. The learned Tribunal, in this case, has passed theimpugned judgment on the basis of its other judgment dated27.03.2002, passed in Income Tax Appeal No.2145 of 1996 -ITO Vs. Maheshwari Nirman Udhyog. We are informed that,that judgment has been affirmed, in appeal, by this Courton 26.07.2007, in the judgment reported in 211 CTR 579.This position is not disputed by the learned counsel forthe revenue. That being the position, to say the least, thecontroversy, involved in the present case, is squarelycovered by the judgment of this Court, reported inCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Maheshwari Nirman Udhyog,and appeal is decided against the revenue, and in favour ofthe assessee. Resultantly, the appeal, is dismissed, for theaforesaid reasons. (KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. jpa/
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan