Income Tax Appeal v. Mr. A.s. Jaiswal, Adv. For
High Court
25 Jul 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. Mr. A.s. Jaiswal, Adv. For
Date of order
25 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Income Tax Appeal v. Mr. A.s. Jaiswal, Adv. For, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAYBENCH AT NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 87/2007(Commissionr of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur vs. Smt. Saroj N. Agrawal, Nagpur )
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coramappearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judges Order
..................................................................................................................................................................
Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, Adv. for appellant
CORAM: A.P.LAVANDE & R.V.MORE, JJ. DATED: 25th JULY, 2007.
***
1.Mr. A.S.Jaiswal, learned counsel for the appellant states
that tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs. 4 lakhs and, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal, in view of Circular dated 5[th] June, 2007 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes.
2.Leave granted. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
3.Registrar (J) of this Court to refund the court fees to the
appellant, if permissible under the Rules.
sahare
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue