In Income Tax Appeal v. M/S. Concast (India) Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Consequently, the application forcondonation of delay of 44 days in filing the appeal is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2628 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1036 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai...Vs.
Appellant.
M/s. Concast (India) Ltd.
..Respondent
--
Shri Vimal Gupta i/by Shri P.S. Sahadevarn for the Appellant.Shri S.P. Mehta for the Respondent.
--
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, CJ & A.P. DESHPANDE, J DATED : 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2008
P.C.
We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the
parties. There is no serious objection for condonation of delay.Delay is explained resonably and sufficiently in the affidavit insupport of the Notice of Motion. Consequently, the application forcondonation of delay of 44 days in filing the appeal is allowed. The
delay is condoned. Notice of Motion accordingly stands disposed of.
2.Appeal to be listed for hearing on admission on 29[th]September, 2008.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P. DESHPANDE, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue