Income Tax Appeal v. Abhay Ahuja, Jj
High Court
12 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. Abhay Ahuja, Jj
Date of order
12 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Income Tax Appeal v. Abhay Ahuja, Jj, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: 2In the light of Circular No.17 of 2019, the Appeal is disposed of asinvolving low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1080 OF 2009
The CIT Central-IV, MumbaiRoom No.663, Aayakar Bhavan,M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 020…Appellant Versus M/s Savita Chemicals Ltd.66-67, Nariman Bhavan,Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021…Respondent
***
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent.
***
CORAM :DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR &
ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
P. C. :
DATE : 12 AUGUST 2022
.Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant states that the taxeffect in the present Appeal is below the limit stipulated in terms ofCircular No.17 of 2019 dated 8 August 2019. It is stated that noinstructions have been received from the Department to withdraw thepresent Appeal.
2In the light of Circular No.17 of 2019, the Appeal is disposed of asinvolving low tax effect.
3However, we observe that in case, the Revenue finds for somereason that the Appeal was not supposed to have been withdrawn in thelight of the Circular, it would be open to the Revenue to file an applicationseeking restoration of the Appeal to be decided on its own merits. Refund
Chittewan
of Court-fees as per rules.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Digitally signed byRAJESHRAJESH VASANTVASANTCHITTEWANCHITTEWANDate: 2022.08.1711:55:01 +0530
(DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.