Income Tax Appeal v. The Cit
High Court
21 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. The Cit
Date of order
21 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Income Tax Appeal v. The Cit, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, the present Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such, with the aforesaid liberty.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2000
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2000
Smt.Indira Jayantilal Vikamsey & Anr. .. Appellant
Vs.
The CIT .. Respondent
Mr.B.V.Jhaveri for the Appellant.
Mr.Abhay Ahuja i/by Mr.H.R.Pandey for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 21st October, 2008
DATE : 21st October, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. This
appeal arises out of an order passed by the ITAT in the
Misc.Application. In view of the judgment of our Court
in the case of Chem Amit V/s.ACIT - (2005) 272 ITR 397,
Chem Amit V/s.ACIT - (2005) 272 ITR 397,
the present Appeal which is filed against the aforesaid
order of the ITAT passed in the Misc.Application, is not
maintainable at all. In view thereof, the learned
Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this
Appeal with liberty to adopt an appropriate proceedings.
Accordingly, the present Appeal is allowed to be
withdrawn and stands dismissed as such, with the
aforesaid liberty.
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.