Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Appeal v. R.s.mohite, Jj

Income Tax Appeal v. R.s.mohite, Jj

High Court 20 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. R.s.mohite, Jj
Date of order
20 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Income Tax Appeal v. R.s.mohite, Jj, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1367 of 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax-3. .Appellant Vs. M/s. K.R. Steel Unino Ltd. .Respondent Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr. A.K. Jasani, fr the Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 20th February,2009 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 20th February,2009 P.C. P.C. . Mr.Jasani waives notice on behalf of the respondent. 2. The Revenue has come in Appeal on the following question: "(A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law the Hon’ble Tribunal was right in holding that in the absence of any positive Income and no tax being levied penalty for concealment could not be levied prior to the amendment of sub-section (a) of Explanation 4 to Section 271 of the Income-tax Act by Finance Act 2002?" (-2-) The learned Tribunal dismissed the appeal relying on Virtual Soft the judgment of the Supreme Court in Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. Vs. CIT, 289 ITR 83. The said Systems Ltd. Vs. CIT, 289 ITR 83. Systems Ltd. Vs. CIT, 289 ITR 83. judgment has thereafter reconsidered by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. Gold Coin Health Food Private Ltd., Civil Appeal No.5065 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.4379 of 2007) and C.A. No.5066/2008 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.14785/2007) decided on 18th August, 2008. In the light of the above, the matter is remanded back to the Tribunal to decide the matter on merits. Appeal disposed of accordingly. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan