In Income Tax Appeal v. M.s.sanklecha, Jj, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4That being the position, this Appeal has become infructuous and the same is accordingly disposed of. [ M.S.SANKLECHA,J.] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1817 OF 2016
Principal Commissioner ofIncome Tax-12, Mumbai: Appellant.versusJas Trading Pvt. Ltd.: Respondent.
...................
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellant.Mr. Rahul Hakani for the Respondent.
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 27, 2019.
P.C.:
1This Appeal is filed by the Revenue challenging the judgment andorder dated 29/01/2016 passed by the Income Tax Tribunal.
2The learned counsel for the parties bring to our notice thedevelopments which took place after filing of the present Appeal.
3Rectification Application filed by the Revenue before the Tribunalwhich was also allowed by the Tribunal and the judgment and order dated29/01/2016 which is impugned in the Appeal was withdrawn.
4That being the position, this Appeal has become infructuous and
the same is accordingly disposed of.
[ M.S.SANKLECHA,J.]
[ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue