Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Appeal v. Heard

Income Tax Appeal v. Heard

High Court 29 Nov 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. Heard
Date of order
29 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Income Tax Appeal v. Heard, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

mmj 1 ITXA NO.3129/09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3129 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-23: Appellant.VersusM/s.Kumagai Skanska HCC ITOCHU group: Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr. Sanjiv M Shah for the Respondent. CORAM :J P DEVADHAR AND R M SAVANT, JJ.DATED :29[th] NOVEMBER 2010 P.C. Heard. Perused Appeal. 2Admit on the following substantial question of law :- “(i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble Tribunal was correct in holding that interest earned on deposits amounting to Rs.2,22,75,000/- was to be adjusted against the value of work in progress and not to be treated as income from other sources ? “(ii)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble Tribunal was correct in holding that interest earned on short term bank deposits by the Assessee is chargeable to tax under the head “income from business or profession” where the said interest income earned from short term fixed deposits was not related to the business activity of the Assessee? Mr. Sanjiv shah, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent waives notice for the Respondent. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [J P DEVADHAR, J]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan