In Income Tax Appeal v. Mr.atul Jasani With Niraj Seth And P.c.tripathi, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.497 OF 2007
The Commissioner of I.T.-4AppellantversusGoldcrest Capital Markets Ltd.Respondent
Mr.R.Ashokan for appellant.
Mr.Atul Jasani with Niraj Seth and P.C.Tripathifor respondent.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI ANDA.A.KUMBHAKONI, JJ.DATE : 22nd September 2008PC :
1. The questions framed in this petition havealready been decided by another Bench in IncomeTax Appeal No.18 of 2006 on 8th August 2008 andit is conceded by both the counsel that theappeal of revenue has been dismissed.Following the same, this appeal is alsodismissed.
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
(A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue