Income Tax Appeal v. As Such, The Appeal Deserves To Bedismissed. Ordered Accordingly
High Court
10 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Income Tax Appeal v. As Such, The Appeal Deserves To Bedismissed. Ordered Accordingly
Date of order
10 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Income Tax Appeal v. As Such, The Appeal Deserves To Bedismissed. Ordered Accordingly, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.500 OF 2007
The Commisioner of Income TaxMumbai City-13, Mumbai.Appellant
versus
M/s.Dhanpankaj Polyster, MumbaiRespondent
A.S.Shivsharan for appellant.
K.B.Bhujale for respondent.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI ANDA.A.KUMBHAKONI, JJ.DATE : 10th September 2008
PC :
1. The question raised in this appeal as towhether texturising and twisting of the yarnwas a manufacturing activity or not, has alreadybeen decided by this Court in its judgementreported in (2008)-170-Taxman-332 (Bom) and theimpugned order is in conformity with thisjudgement.
2. As such, the appeal deserves to bedismissed. Ordered accordingly.
(A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue