Case Law › High Court › Income Tax Appeal v. A.a.kumbhakoni, J

Income Tax Appeal v. A.a.kumbhakoni, J

High Court 22 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Sep 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Income Tax Appeal v. A.a.kumbhakoni, J, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.575 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-VIV, Mumbai.Appellant versus M/s.Pam Pharma. & Allied Mach-inery Co. LimitedRespondent Mr.Beni M. Chatterji with Vishnu Vagthanan forappellant. None for respondent. PC : CORAM : BILAL NAZKI ANDA.A.KUMBHAKONI, JJ.DATE : 22nd September 2008 1. Mr.Chatterji appears for the appellant.The questions framed in this petition arealready decided by the Supreme Court injudgement reported in 290-ITR-66 against theRevenue. Following the said judgement, presentappeal is accordingly dismissed. (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.